Premium
Efficacy of a soft hand brace and a wrist splint for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled study
Author(s) -
De Angelis M. V.,
Pierfelice F.,
Di Giovanni P.,
Staniscia T.,
Uncini A.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
acta neurologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.967
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 1600-0404
pISSN - 0001-6314
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2008.01072.x
Subject(s) - carpal tunnel syndrome , medicine , wrist , brace , visual analogue scale , randomized controlled trial , splint (medicine) , carpal tunnel , physical therapy , median nerve , splints , surgery , mechanical engineering , engineering
Objective – To examine, in a randomized, controlled, single blinded trial, the efficacy of a soft hand brace and a wrist splint for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods – We randomized 120 patients with CTS into a group wearing the soft hand brace MANU ® and into another group wearing the wrist splint CAMP TIELLE ® at night for 3 months. We re‐evaluated the patients after 3 (T1) and 9 months (T2). The primary efficacy measures were changes in scores of Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) and in Visual Analogical Scale (VAS) for pain and paresthesias. Results – At T1, both groups showed a significant reduction in symptomatic and functional BCTQ (T0–T1 differences: MANU ® BCTQ sympt: 0.88 (0.68–1.08), funct: 0.45 (0.19–0.72); TIELLE ® BCTQ sympt: 0.78 (0.55–1.01), funct: 0.41 (0.22–0.59). At T2, a less evident benefit on symptoms persisted in both groups, except for pain VAS score that was significantly reduced only in the CAMP TIELLE ® group. No significant functional benefits persisted in either group. There were no differences in BCTQ and VAS scores between the two groups at T1 and T2 compared with that at baseline. Conclusions – A 3‐month treatment with either the hand brace or the wrist splint induces a symptomatic and functional benefit in patients with CTS.