Premium
Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs: what can we learn from long‐term studies?
Author(s) -
Zaccara G.,
Messori A.,
Cincotta M.,
Burchini G.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
acta neurologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.967
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 1600-0404
pISSN - 0001-6314
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2006.00705.x
Subject(s) - tolerability , oxcarbazepine , levetiracetam , lamotrigine , medicine , topiramate , tiagabine , adverse effect , zonisamide , gabapentin , pregabalin , epilepsy , anesthesia , pharmacology , psychiatry , carbamazepine , alternative medicine , pathology
Objective – A review of long‐term open‐label studies was performed with the aim of detecting differences in efficacy and/or tolerability of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Methods – From more than 500 open studies conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV), oxcarbazepine (OXC), pregabalin (PGB), tiagabine (TGB), topiramate (TPM) or zonisamide (ZNS), we selected all studies that reported or allowed us to calculate the number of patients who achieved seizure freedom for 6 months and/or the number of patients withdrawing for adverse effects and/or the number or percentage of patients continuing treatment after 1 year. Results – No studies were found in which this information was available for OXC, PGB, TGB or ZNS. The number of patients who achieved seizure freedom for 6 months was reported in four studies each for GBP and TPM, five studies for LTG, and eight studies for LEV. The best efficacy profile using this end point was found for LEV, followed by TPM, LTG, and GBP. Twenty‐two studies reported the number of patients withdrawing due to adverse effects. LEV was the best‐tolerated AED, a little ahead of LTG, and significantly better than GBP or TPM . TPM was by far the least well‐tolerated drug. Information concerning patients continuing treatment after 1 year was reported in two GBP studies, two TPM studies, six LEV studies and five LTG studies. GBP had a very low retention rate (between 20% and 25% of patients continued the drug), while TPM and LTG had a retention rate of 40–60% and LEV had a retention rate of 60–75%. Conclusion – One limitation of these rankings is that their statistical value is limited because of the indirect nature of the comparisons. Anyhow, this review covers the main studies published thus far on this subject and provides full updated information on the current literature about these drugs.