z-logo
Premium
Crossed–uncrossed difference (CUD) in a new light: anatomy of the negative CUD in Poffenberger's paradigm
Author(s) -
Derakhshan I.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
acta neurologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.967
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 1600-0404
pISSN - 0001-6314
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00563.x
Subject(s) - laterality , psychology , right hemisphere , audiology , anatomy , cognitive psychology , developmental psychology , medicine
Crossed Uncrossed Differentials (CUDs) have long been used as surrogate for the interhemispheric transfer time (IHTT). Evidence is presented that macular vision is the province of the major hemisphere, wherein all commands are initiated regardless of the laterality of the effectors of such commands. Using clinical and time‐resolved data it is shown also that the above arrangement (i.e. neural handedness) corresponds to the subject's behavioral avowed (avowed, self‐declared) handedness only in a statistical sense; with a substantial minority of humanity displaying a disparity of neural and behavioral handedness. Evidence is provided that the negative CUD in previously reported studies was a reflection of such incongruity in those subjects studied. Thus, to lateralize the command center it is sufficient to determine the reaction time of two symmetrically located effectors on the body. The side with longer reaction time is ipsilateral to the major hemisphere, with the difference of the two sides commensurate to transcallosal IHTT.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here