Premium
Neurophysiological classification and sensitivity in 500 carpal tunnel syndrome hands
Author(s) -
Padua L.,
LoMonaco M.,
Gregori B.,
Valente E. M.,
Padua R.,
Tonali P.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
acta neurologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.967
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 1600-0404
pISSN - 0001-6314
DOI - 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1997.tb00271.x
Subject(s) - carpal tunnel syndrome , neurophysiology , wrist , medicine , gold standard (test) , physical medicine and rehabilitation , median nerve , sensory system , audiology , surgery , psychology , neuroscience , psychiatry
Objectives ‐ To evaluate the following points about carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS): 1) characterization of a wide population; 2) sensitivity of electrodiagnostic tests, and particularly the contribution of disto‐proximal ratio test; 3) validity of a neurophysiological classification developed by us. Material and methods ‐ Prospective study in 500 hands with CTS symptoms. Neurophysiological “standard” tests were always performed: sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) first‐ and third digit‐wrist and distal motor latency (DML). In “standard negative” hands disto‐proximal ratio technique (R) was performed. Neurophysiological classification: Extreme CTS (absence of median motor, sensory responses), Severe (absence of sensory response, abnormal DML), Moderate (abnormal SNCV, abnormal DML), Mild (abnormal SNCV, normal DML), Minimal (abnormal R or other segmental/comparative test, normal standard tests). Results‐ Sensibility of standard tests: 77%. R increased the diagnostic yield by 20%. CTS classification appeared reliable with significant differences between groups. Conclusion ‐ R is a useful test, the classification may be useful in clinical/therapeutical decisions.