Premium
Efficacy of Carpophilus aggregation pheromones on nine species in northeastern Ohio, and identification of the pheromone of C. brachypterus
Author(s) -
Williams R. N.,
Ellis M. S.,
Bartelt R. J.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
entomologia experimentalis et applicata
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.765
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1570-7458
pISSN - 0013-8703
DOI - 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1995.tb01994.x
Subject(s) - sex pheromone , attraction , pheromone , biology , botany , zoology , linguistics , philosophy
Aggregation pheromones for seven Carpophilus (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) species were field tested at a site with a rich nitidulid fauna in Ohio, USA, during the summers of 1992 and 1993. The pheromones used were blends identified for: Carpophilus antiquus (Melsheimer), C. brachypterus (Say), C. freemani Dobson, C. hemipterus (L.), C. lugubris Murray, C. mutilatus Erichson, and C. obsoletus Erichson. Each pheromone was used in conjunction with whole wheat bread dough, an effective co‐attractant. The pheromone of C. brachypterus Say was identified during the course of this study and was also tested; males emitted a 100:6:11:4:3 blend of (2E, 4E, 6E, 8E)‐3, 5, 7‐trimethyl‐2, 4, 6, 8‐decatetraene, (2E, 4E, 6E, 8E)‐3, 5, 7‐trimethyl‐2, 4, 6, 8‐undecatetraene, (2E, 4E, 6E, 8E)‐7‐ethyl‐3, 5‐dimethyl‐2, 4, 6, 8‐decatetraene, (3E, 5E, 7E, 9E)‐4, 6, 8‐trimethyl‐3, 5, 7, 9‐undecatetraene and (2E, 4E, 6E, 8E)‐7‐ethyl‐3, 5‐dimethyl‐2, 4, 6, 8‐undecatetraene, respectively. All species responded favorably to their own pheromones with the exception of C. obsoletus , which was not present in this area. Strong mutual cross attraction was observed between C. brachypterus and C. hemipterus. In addition, C. lugubris responded to the pheromones of C. obsoletus and C. hemipterus and, more weakly, to those of C. freemani and C. brachypterus ; C. freemani responded slightly to the pheromone of C. mutilatus ; and C. antiquus responded to the pheromone of C. lugubris. In most cases, cross attraction was related to the species involved sharing pheromone components. For C. antiquus , however, the response to the C. lugubris pheromone was apparently kairomonal. C. corticinus, C. marginatus, C. marginellus , and C. sayi , for which pheromones are not known, were attracted to the pheromone of C. lugubris and in some cases to other pheromones. Significant numbers of Colopterus spp. responded to the blends for C. lugubris, C. hemipterus, C. brachypterus , and probably, C. obsoletus.