Premium
Within‐patch foraging behaviour of the aphid parasitoid Aphidius funebris : plant architecture, host behaviour, and individual variation
Author(s) -
Weisser Wolfgang W.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
entomologia experimentalis et applicata
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.765
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1570-7458
pISSN - 0013-8703
DOI - 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1995.tb01955.x
Subject(s) - parasitoid , biology , aphid , aphididae , host (biology) , foraging , hymenoptera , homoptera , instar , botany , braconidae , parasitism , horticulture , zoology , ecology , pest analysis , larva
The influence of plant architecture, host colony size, and host colony structure on the foraging behaviour of the aphid parasitoid Aphidius funebris Mackauer (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) was investigated using a factorial experimental design. The factorial design involved releasing individual parasitoid females in aphid colonies consisting of either 10 or 20 individuals of Uroleucon jaceae L. (Homoptera: Aphididae) of either only larval instar L3 or a mixture of host instars, both on unmanipulated plants and on plants that had all leaves adjacent to the colony removed. Interactions between the parasitoid and its host were recorded until the parasitoid had left the plant. The time females spent on the host plant and the number of eggs laid varied greatly among females. Host colony size significantly affected patch residence time and the number of contacts between parasitoids and aphids. Plant architecture influenced the time‐budget of the parasitoids which used leaves adjacent to the aphid colony for attacking aphids. Female oviposition rate was higher on unmanipulated plants than on manipulated plants. No further significant treatment effects on patch residence time, the number of contacts, attacks or ovipositions were found. Oviposition success of A. funebris was influenced by instar‐specific host behaviour. Several rules‐of‐thumb proposed by foraging theory did not account for parasitoid patch‐leaving behaviour.