Premium
Comparison of Behavioral Belief Structures in the Physical Activity Domain
Author(s) -
Rhodes Ryan E.,
Conner Mark
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of applied social psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.822
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1559-1816
pISSN - 0021-9029
DOI - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00652.x
Subject(s) - psychology , dimension (graph theory) , multicollinearity , social psychology , construct (python library) , domain (mathematical analysis) , structural equation modeling , cognitive psychology , statistics , regression analysis , mathematics , computer science , mathematical analysis , pure mathematics , programming language
Behavioral belief structures were evaluated in the physical activity domain along 4 dimensions: positive–negative, affective–instrumental, distal–proximal, and specific motive. Participants completed 19 behavioral belief items and a measure of intention. These behavioral beliefs were subsequently classified on each dimension by 2 independent judges. Results using structural equation modeling showed that positive–negative, affective–instrumental, and proximal–distal dimensions each improved fit over a single behavioral belief construct. Division by affective–instrumental and positive–negative yielded the best fit, compared to single dimensions, but no division resulted in adequate model fit. Indeed, fit continued to improve as each dimension was added, but this specificity came with incumbent multicollinearity when trying to use the constructs for prediction purposes.