Premium
When Is Believing “Seeing”? Hostile Attribution Bias as a Function of Self‐Reported Aggression 1
Author(s) -
Matthews B. Alex,
Norris Fran H.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
journal of applied social psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.822
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1559-1816
pISSN - 0021-9029
DOI - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01418.x
Subject(s) - anger , attribution , hostility , psychology , aggression , provocation test , attribution bias , social psychology , ethnic group , human factors and ergonomics , clinical psychology , poison control , developmental psychology , medical emergency , medicine , alternative medicine , pathology , sociology , anthropology
Repeated exposure to adverse advents (e.g., risky driving) was thought to increase expectations for the recurrence of the event. Community‐based drivers (130 men, 133 women) were given scenarios depicting everyday road events that could be construed as benign, ambiguous, or malign by the degree of perceived provocation. Differences between levels of gender, ethnicity, age, aggressiveness, and provocation were measured by attributions of intent, hostility, and anger. Results showed that, overall, drivers accurately perceived provocation conditions. Hostile attributional biases were not evident among the sample as a whole, but were dependent on level of aggressiveness and provocation. Analysis of self‐reported driving behavior showed that young, aggressive majority group drivers who experience greater aggression on the road also were more likely to take more risks while driving. Controlling for miles driven, gender differences were not found.