Well…ah…: Hesitations and Hedges as an Influence on Jurors' Decisions  1 | Zendy

Mendoza Norma A. | Zendy; Hosch Harmon M. | Zendy; Ponder Bruce J. | Zendy; Carrillo Victor | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Premium

Well…ah…: Hesitations and Hedges as an Influence on Jurors' Decisions 1

Author(s) -

Mendoza Norma A.,

Hosch Harmon M.,

Ponder Bruce J.,

Carrillo Victor

Publication year - 2000

Publication title -

journal of applied social psychology

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.822

H-Index - 111

eISSN - 1559-1816

pISSN - 0021-9029

DOI - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02452.x

Subject(s) - witness , psychology , credibility , interpretation (philosophy) , dominance (genetics) , context (archaeology) , social psychology , style (visual arts) , law , linguistics , political science , philosophy , paleontology , history , biochemistry , chemistry , archaeology , biology , gene

Hispanic jurors' verdicts and whether these decisions were related to jurors' judgments of the credibility of the witness were the focus of this experiment. A prosecution witness testified in English or in Spanish with interpretation in English. Witnesses' speaking style systematically included hedges and hesitations or did not. Guilty verdicts were independent of language of testimony. Within Spanish‐interpreted conditions, jurors convicted the defendant 47% of the time in the absence of hedges and hesitations. When he hedged and hesitated, they convicted 34% of the time. This effect was complicated by a reliable Witness Hesitation × Juror Language Dominance interaction. These results are interpreted in the context of the courtroom impact of non‐English‐speaking witnesses and the impact of interpretation.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research