z-logo
Premium
Do Solo Arrangements Lead to Attributions of Tokenism? Perceptions of Selection Criteria and Task Assignments to Race and Gender Solos 1
Author(s) -
Craig Kellina M.,
Feasel Karen E.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of applied social psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.822
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1559-1816
pISSN - 0021-9029
DOI - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01347.x
Subject(s) - psychology , social psychology , tokenism , attribution , race (biology) , context (archaeology) , task (project management) , affirmative action , perception , action (physics) , gender studies , sociology , management , paleontology , physics , quantum mechanics , neuroscience , anthropology , economics , biology
In 2 studies, African American and White participants judged the likelihood that solos in work groups were selected for membership in a work group on the basis of either affirmative action or ability. Following this, they were asked to imagine themselves as managers of the group and to assign tasks to each of the employees. Judgments of the overall work groups were also obtained. As expected, the extent to which observers attributed the presence of the solo to affirmative action and assigned tasks was dependent on the gender and race of the solo and, importantly, the gender and race of the majority of group members. These findings have practical utility in that they point to the continuing importance of context effects in impression formation and task assignments.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here