Premium
Ambiguity and Guilt Determinations: A Modern Racism Perspective 1
Author(s) -
Pfeifer Jeffrey E.,
Ogloff James R. P.
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
journal of applied social psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.822
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1559-1816
pISSN - 0021-9029
DOI - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00500.x
Subject(s) - jury , psychology , jury instructions , prejudice (legal term) , racism , social psychology , perspective (graphical) , ambiguity , white (mutation) , element (criminal law) , order (exchange) , law , political science , linguistics , philosophy , biochemistry , chemistry , finance , artificial intelligence , computer science , economics , gene
Studies documenting the existence of prejudice in simulated juror ratings of guilt may not be directly generalizable to legal applications due to a failure to include jury instructions. Jury instructions specifying the conditions required to find a defendant guilty may serve to dissipate juror's overt prejudices. In order to investigate this hypothesis, participants read a transcript of a trial in which the race of the victim and the defendant were varied. In addition, half the participants were given jury instructions which specified the elements of the crime, and noted that in order to find the defendant guilty each element had to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Participants were then asked to rate the guilt of the defendant. Results replicated earlier studies which found that participants overwhelmingly rate black defendants guiltier than white defendants, especially when the victim is white. However, these differences disappeared when participants were provided with jury instructions. The findings are discussed with regard to the theory of modern racism.