Premium
Good‐Fast‐Cheap: Pick Any Two: Dilemmas About the Value of Applicable Research 1
Author(s) -
Nogami Glenda Y.
Publication year - 1982
Publication title -
journal of applied social psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.822
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1559-1816
pISSN - 0021-9029
DOI - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1982.tb00870.x
Subject(s) - value (mathematics) , psychology , external validity , quality (philosophy) , management science , social psychology , internal validity , epistemology , computer science , mathematics , economics , philosophy , machine learning , statistics
Questions of internal validity vs. external validity have long been of concern to social and organizational psychologists. In recent years, the issue of applicability of research data has been emphasized as well. The present paper distinguishes between basic, applied, and applicable research. It is concluded that sufficient criteria for judging basic and applied research are available. However, there appears to be little agreement about the value and the quality of most applicable research. To help alleviate this problem, criteria for judging applicable research are suggested. The potential contributions of basic, applied, and applicable research to policy formation and to the search for solutions which are relevant to social, organizational, and governmental problems are considered.