Premium
ANTAGONISTIC PLEIOTROPIC EFFECT OF SECOND‐CHROMOSOME INVERSIONS ON BODY SIZE AND EARLY LIFE‐HISTORY TRAITS IN DROSOPHILA BUZZATII
Author(s) -
Betrán Esther,
Santos Mauro,
Ruiz Alfredo
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.84
H-Index - 199
eISSN - 1558-5646
pISSN - 0014-3820
DOI - 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb05147.x
Subject(s) - biology , pleiotropy , chromosomal inversion , genetics , evolutionary biology , phenotype , genetic correlation , karyotype , chromosome , affect (linguistics) , gene , genetic variation , linguistics , philosophy
A simple way to think of evolutionary trade‐offs is to suppose genetic effects of opposed direction that give rise to antagonistic pleiotropy. Maintenance of additive genetic variability for fitness related characters, in association with negative correlations between these characters, may result. In the cactophilic species Drosophila buzzatii , there is evidence that second‐chromosome polymorphic inversions affect size‐related traits. Because a trade‐off between body size and larval developmental time has been reported in Drosophila , we study here whether or not these inversions also affect larva‐adult viability and developmental time. In particular, we expect that polymorphic inversions make a statistically significant contribution to the genetic correlation between body size (as measured by thorax length) and larval developmental time. This contribution is expected to be in the direction predicted by the trade‐off, namely, those flies whose karyotypes cause them to be genetically larger should also have a longer developmental time than flies with other karyotypes. Using two different experimental approaches, a statistically significant contribution of the second‐chromosome inversions to the phenotypic variances of body size and developmental time in D. buzzatii was found. Further, these inversions make a positive contribution to the total genetic correlation between the traits, as expected by the suggested trade‐off. The data do not provide evidence as to whether the genetic correlation is due to antagonistic pleiotropic gene action or to gametic disequilibrium of linked genes that affect one or both traits. The results do suggest, however, a possible explanation for the maintenance of inversion polymorphism in this species.