z-logo
Premium
COMPLEX COLONY STRUCTURE IN SOCIAL INSECTS: I. ECOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS AND GENETIC CONSEQUENCES
Author(s) -
Banschbach Valerie S.,
Herbers Joan M.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.84
H-Index - 199
eISSN - 1558-5646
pISSN - 0014-3820
DOI - 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb04492.x
Subject(s) - biology , inbreeding , ecology , population , polygyny , genetic structure , mating system , mating , nest (protein structural motif) , intraspecific competition , zoology , genetic variation , demography , genetics , biochemistry , sociology , gene
For social insect species, intraspecific variation in colony social structure provides an opportunity to relate the evolution of social behavior to ecological factors. The species Myrmica punctiventris is a cavity‐dwelling forest ant that exhibits very different colony structures in two populations in the northeastern United States. Combined data from seasonal censuses, allozyme electrophoresis, and worker hostility tests showed that a population of M. punctiventris in Vermont was strictly monogynous and seasonally polydomous. The same procedures showed that a population of M. punctiventris in New York was facultatively polygynous and predominantly monodomous. Genetic relatedness among colony‐mates was not different from Hamilton's expected values in the Vermont population and was consistent with little exchange of ants between colonies and single‐mating of queens. In contrast, relatedness was lower in New York, and examination of nest‐mate genotypes revealed exchange of ants between colonies, high rates of colony loss and replacement of queens, or multiple‐mating of queens. The genetic structure of the Vermont population was consistent with no inbreeding, but in New York, the population genetic structure reflected microgeographic subdivision and inbreeding. Previous study of the ant communities at these sites implicates nest‐site limitation in New York as a primary constraint on social structure.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here