z-logo
Premium
GENETIC CONSTRAINTS TO LIFE‐HISTORY EVOLUTION IN THE PITCHER‐PLANT MOSQUITO, WYEOMYIA SMITHII
Author(s) -
Bradshaw William E.,
Holzapfel Christina M.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.84
H-Index - 199
eISSN - 1558-5646
pISSN - 0014-3820
DOI - 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb02358.x
Subject(s) - biology , diapause , fecundity , survivorship curve , pleiotropy , life history theory , context (archaeology) , evolutionary biology , selection (genetic algorithm) , genetic correlation , genetic fitness , ecology , life history , genetics , larva , genetic variation , population , demography , biological evolution , gene , paleontology , cancer , artificial intelligence , sociology , computer science , phenotype
Life‐history theory relies heavily on the hypothesis that genetic tradeoffs among the components of fitness constrain their independent evolution and joint maximization. Herein we show that selection on preadult development time in the pitcher‐plant mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii , leads to a correlated response in cohort mean generation time but no correlated response in survivorship, fecundity, or cohort replacement rate. Lines selected for fast development achieve a higher capacity for increase (r c ) than lines selected for slow development, independently of larval density. These results imply that tradeoffs due to underlying antagonistic pleiotropy affecting growth, development, survivorship, and reproduction are not necessary constraints to life‐history evolution. Previous work with W. smithii has shown a positive genetic correlation between development time and a general, genetically coordinated diapause syndrome. We propose that the observed nontradeoffs among the components of r c may be subsumed into an even more fundamental tradeoff between performance during the summer generations and synchronization of development and reproduction with the changing seasons. Consequently, critical tests of genetic tradeoffs as a constraint to the independent evolution or simultaneous optimization of fitness components may need to consider the seasonal context.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here