WHEN DOES EVOLUTION BY NATURAL SELECTION PREVENT EXTINCTION?

Understanding population responses to novel environments is a central concern of both evolutionary biology and ecology (Maynard Smith 1989; Bradshaw 1991; Hoffman and Parsons 1991; Peters and Lovejoy 1992; Kareiva et al. 1993). Populations subject to substantial environmental stress, such as occurs during colonization attempts, human-mediated introductions or reintroductions, or global climatic change, may face a risk of extinction. There are many examples of such extinctions, but many examples are known in which populations have evolved sufficiently to persist in changed environments, such as cases of evolved resistance to pesticides or heavy metal toxins (e.g., Bradshaw 1991). An important problem for evolutionary biologists is thus to characterize those combinations of genetic and demographic conditions likely to result in persistence versus those expected to lead to extinction in a changed environment. Theoretical work has characterized circumstances in which populations have sufficient genetic capacity to avoid extinction by adapting with sufficient speed to a continuously changing environment (Pease et al. 1989; Lynch et al. 1991; Lynch and Lande 1993; Burger and Lynch 1994). Here we use simple models to highlight an additional risk faced even by populations genetically capable of evolving sufficiently to persist in environments that remain constant following a single, initial abrupt change. Namely, as a population adapts to a novel environment, its de'nsity may fall below a critically low level for a period of time, during which the population is highly vulnerable to extinction by demographic stochasticity. If this occurs, the population is likely to vanish before it can be rescued by evolution. To examine this problem, we coupled models of population dynamics and of evolution by natural selection to identify conditions for which evolution succeeds-or fails-to rescue a closed population from extinction following abrupt environmental change. The models considered here cover extremes in both genetics (one-locus and polygenic models) and population growth (discrete and continuous-time models). These models lead to a similar conclusion: even populations with the genetic wherewithal to potentially persist in a novel environment may often fail to do so. Moreover, our analyses help to quantitatively characterize situations in which evolution by natural selection can effectively rescue a population from impending extinction. We suspect the qualitative properties of our results may be general features of evolutionary dynamics in novel environments.