Premium
THE EVOLUTIONARY GENETICS OF MALE LIFE‐HISTORY CHARACTERS IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER
Author(s) -
Hughes Kimberly A.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.84
H-Index - 199
eISSN - 1558-5646
pISSN - 0014-3820
DOI - 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02284.x
Subject(s) - biology , additive genetic effects , genetic variation , life history theory , evolutionary biology , epistasis , selection (genetic algorithm) , quantitative genetics , pleiotropy , drosophila melanogaster , genetic model , genetics , heritability , phenotype , ecology , gene , life history , artificial intelligence , computer science
Alternative models of the maintenance of genetic variability, theories of life‐history evolution, and theories of sexual selection and mate choice can be tested by measuring additive and nonadditive genetic variances of components of fitness. A quantitative genetic breeding design was used to produce estimates of genetic variances for male life‐history traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Additive genetic covariances and correlations between traits were also estimated. Flies from a large, outbred, laboratory population were assayed for age‐specific competitive mating ability, age‐specific survivorship, body mass, and fertility. Variance‐component analysis then allowed the decomposition of phenotypic variation into components associated with additive genetic, nonadditive genetic, and environmental variability. A comparison of dominance and additive components of genetic variation provides little support for an important role for balancing selection in maintaining genetic variance in this suite of traits. The results provide support for the mutation‐accumulation theory, but not the antagonistic‐pleiotropy theory of senescence. No evidence is found for the positive genetic correlations between mating success and offspring quality or quantity that are predicted by “good genes” models of sexual selection. Additive genetic coefficients of variation for life‐history characters are larger than those for body weight. Finally, this set of male life‐history characters exhibits a very low correspondence between estimates of genetic and phenotypic correlations.