Premium
A SIMULATION OF WRIGHT'S SHIFTING‐BALANCE PROCESS: MIGRATION AND THE THREE PHASES
Author(s) -
Moore Francisco B.G.,
Tonsor Stephen J.
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.84
H-Index - 199
eISSN - 1558-5646
pISSN - 0014-3820
DOI - 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb01295.x
Subject(s) - population , biology , range (aeronautics) , phase (matter) , selection (genetic algorithm) , statistics , demography , physics , mathematics , materials science , computer science , quantum mechanics , artificial intelligence , sociology , composite material
Wright partitioned the shifting‐balance process into three phases. Phase one is the shift of a deme within a population to the domain of a higher adaptive peak from that of the historical peak. Phase two is mass selection within a deme towards that higher peak. Phase three is the conversion of additional demes to the higher peak. The migration rate between demes is critical for the existence of phases one and three. Phase one requires small effective population sizes, hence low migration rates. Phase three is optimal under high migration rates that spread the most‐fit genotype from deme to deme. Thus, a population‐wide peak shift requires intermediate levels of migration. By altering the rates of phases one and three, migration affects the predominant direction of mass selection within a population. This study examines the degree to which migration, through its effects on phases one and three, determines the probability of a simulated population arriving at its genotypic optimum after 12,000 generations. These simulations reveal that there is a range of migration rates for which an entire population might be expected to shift to a higher peak. Below m = 0.001 peak shifts occur frequently (phases I and II) but are not successfully exported out of subpopulations (phase III), and above 0.01 peak shifts within demes (phase I and II), required to initiate phase III, become increasingly uncommon. Because it is unlikely that real populations will have uniform migration rates from generation to generation, the probable effects of varying migration rates on broadening the range of conditions producing peak shifts are discussed.