Premium
GENETIC CONSTRAINTS ON THE INDEPENDENT EVOLUTION OF MALE AND FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTERS IN THE TRISTYLOUS PLANT LYTHRUM SALICARIA
Author(s) -
O'Neil Pamela,
Schmitt Johanna
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.84
H-Index - 199
eISSN - 1558-5646
pISSN - 0014-3820
DOI - 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb02168.x
Subject(s) - biology , perianth , genetic variation , genetic architecture , evolutionary biology , sexual selection , stabilizing selection , selection (genetic algorithm) , directional selection , reproductive success , genetic correlation , gynoecium , stamen , genetics , pollen , gene , botany , phenotype , population , demography , artificial intelligence , sociology , computer science
Here we test whether the potential exists for the independent evolution of allocation to male, female, and attractive functions within a flower. We employed half‐sib and parent‐offspring regression methods in the tristylous plant Lythrum salicaria to determine whether there is additive genetic variation for characters important to male and female reproductive success and whether genetic correlations could constrain the independent evolution of male and female function. Although significance levels were not consistent among morph types or between populations, there were significant narrow‐sense heritabilities for several traits including stamen mass, pistil mass, perianth mass, petal length, and calyx length. Traits that might be under strong stabilizing selection to promote specific pollen transfer, such as stamen and style lengths, had little heritable variation. In the majority of cases in which heritable variation was present, there were positive genetic correlations among floral traits. A strong positive genetic correlation appeared between stamen and pistil mass in the short‐styled morph from one of the populations studied. This suggests that selection might not be able to act independently on biomass allocation to male and female flower parts. No evidence of negative genetic correlations appeared that would suggest trade‐offs and that could augment a selection response towards sexual specialization. The observed positive correlations could be explained if we consider the “functional architecture” that underlies the covariance structure. If there is more covariance generated by pleiotropic loci controlling overall flower size than at loci controlling male versus female allocation, it could result in the observed positive covariance. At the phenotypic level, we did find significant negative partial correlations between male and female traits when flower size was controlled, but these trade‐offs were among rather than within morphs.