Premium
EVOLUTIONARY DIVERGENCE AND CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT IN TWO PHENOTYPICALLY‐VARIABLE, COMPETING SPECIES
Author(s) -
Milligan Brook G.
Publication year - 1985
Publication title -
evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.84
H-Index - 199
eISSN - 1558-5646
pISSN - 0014-3820
DOI - 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb05687.x
Subject(s) - character displacement , character (mathematics) , interspecific competition , biology , divergence (linguistics) , competition (biology) , evolutionary biology , character evolution , displacement (psychology) , flexibility (engineering) , heritability , ecology , evolvability , resource (disambiguation) , sympatry , sympatric speciation , phylogenetic tree , clade , genetics , statistics , computer science , mathematics , psychology , linguistics , philosophy , geometry , computer network , gene , psychotherapist
Theoretical studies of character displacement lead to the view that evolutionary divergence depends primarily on incomplete utilization of available resources. Those models which incorporate constraints preventing complete utilization of resources, even in the absence of competitors, all predict character displacement. Those models which allow greater flexibility of resource use within a species predict correspondingly less divergence. Indeed, Matessi and Jayakar (1980, 1981) based their conditions for occurrence of character displacement on underutilization of resources. I extend a model used by Slatkin (1980, 1983) and Taper and Case (1985) which allows each species to fully utilize its resources in the absence of competitors. I concentrate on the biologically reasonable case in which the species, though similar, differ in their ecological characteristics. As a result of this greater biological realism, I arrive at a different conclusion regarding the conditions which lead to character displacement. The presence of a variety of biological differences between species—including as a subset those which result from resource underutilization—leads to divergence with respect to a quantitatively inherited character, due to interspecific competitive interactions. The resulting displacement can be large and depends little on the parameters chosen. The only exception, involving a character with very low heritability, occurs when the non‐interactive phenotypic differences are much greater than those associated with studies of character displacement in natural populations. Thus, under conditions comparable to those encountered in the field, involving similar yet not identical species, evolutionary divergence is a consequence of interspecific competition.