z-logo
Premium
Choosing Assessment Instruments for Depression Outcome Research With School‐Age Youth
Author(s) -
Muller Brooke E.,
Erford Bradley T.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of counseling and development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.805
H-Index - 78
eISSN - 1556-6676
pISSN - 0748-9633
DOI - 10.1111/j.1556-6676.2012.00026.x
Subject(s) - depression (economics) , strengths and weaknesses , outcome (game theory) , psychology , clinical psychology , social psychology , mathematics , economics , mathematical economics , macroeconomics
Using effect size results from Erford et al.'s (2011) meta‐analysis for treatment of depression in school‐age youth, the authors analyzed 6 commonly used instruments for practical and technical strengths and weaknesses. Effect size estimates from these 6 instruments were compared to indicate likely results when used in future depression outcome research.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here