Premium
Commentary on : Akyildiz E, Uzun I, Inanici MA, Baloglu H. Computerized image analysis in differentiation of skin lesion caused by electrocution, flame burns, and abrasion. J Forensic Sci 2009;54(6):1419–22.
Author(s) -
Pierini Giovanni,
Balbi Tiziana,
Mandrioli Daniele
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of forensic sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.715
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1556-4029
pISSN - 0022-1198
DOI - 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2012.02205.x
Subject(s) - alma mater , electrocution , medical jurisprudence , medicine , humanities , art , surgery , pathology , emergency medicine , dura mater
Dear Sir, We compared our experimental results with the one of the articles of Akyildiz et al., on the importance of morphometric analysis of the perimeter and area of the cell nucleus for the differentiation of skin lesions caused by electrocution, flame burns, and abrasion. We focused on the differential diagnosis between hyperthermic lesion and lesion caused by DC electricity. Our data seem to confirm the original proposal of the authors. In fact, the observations of the authors regarding a nuclear swelling occurring after current application, but not with Joule effect, is consistent with our results. The samples were composed of bioptic material that underwent anatomopathological examination; after cryosection and hydration in saline physiological solution at +4 C to inhibit autolysis, 5-l-thickness sections were placed on a silanized slide. The slide was then placed on a fiberglass support that housed the connection with a CC ⁄DC feeder (Life, Milan Italy) at an outlet stabilized with a digital control (range, 0–30 V; 0–50 mA). The electrodes were placed in contact with the sections of tissue and covered with a coverslip. After application of a 30 V 4 mA DC current for 20 sec, the sections were then dehydrated in a CO2 critical point dryer and finally gold metalized (Balzers Union, Scottsville, VA) for the scanning electron microscope (Philips 515 model; FEI Europe, Eindhoven, the Netherlands). In agreement with the data of Akyildiz et al., we present the results of the experimental application of a DC field (30 V 4 mA) on live human bioptic case. In fact, the first cellular component that ‘‘feels’’ the EM field in the above-mentioned experimental conditions is the nucleus (Fig. 1), thus confirming what has already been thoroughly reported by Akyildiz et al. In the case of the Joule effect, instead, both nuclear and cellular elongation, but not swelling and increased nuclear volume accompanied by karyolysis, is observed (Fig. 2). For more than a century, the correct etiological classification of the lesions due to electricity as opposed to heat represented (and still represents) a nodal problem in forensic medicine. Our data seem to confirm and support the importance of the morphometric analysis proposed by Akyildiz et al. in solving this problem.