Premium
The Utility of the Samworth and Gowland Age‐at‐Death “Look‐up” Tables in Forensic Anthropology *
Author(s) -
Passalacqua Nicholas V.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of forensic sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.715
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1556-4029
pISSN - 0022-1198
DOI - 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01287.x
Subject(s) - pubic symphysis , forensic anthropology , forensic science , identification (biology) , computer science , estimation , manner of death , statistics , poison control , data science , medicine , injury prevention , geography , mathematics , biology , surgery , medical emergency , engineering , archaeology , botany , systems engineering , pelvis
Accurate age‐at‐death estimates are crucial to forensic anthropologists when onstructing biological profiles aimed at narrowing a missing‐persons list and to allow for timely and efficient identification of an unknown victim. The present contribution evaluates the utility of three new age‐at‐death estimation techniques recently proposed by Samworth and Gowland (2007). Results indicate that, in the samples under study, the Samworth and Gowland estimates from the pubic symphysis and auricular surface perform similar to alternate phase methods. The combined method does not appear to further enhance either the precision or the accuracy of the single pubic symphysis age‐at‐death estimate. In conclusion, these new methods seem to be more robust to distribution deviations than originally proposed by Samworth and Gowland (2007). They are therefore suitable for immediate and reliable forensic usage in the United States and worthy of further research for their use in North American forensic contexts.