Premium
Diagnostic Accuracy of Emergency Doppler Echocardiography for Identification of Acute Left Ventricular Heart Failure in Patients with Acute Dyspnea: Comparison with Boston Criteria and N‐terminal Prohormone Brain Natriuretic Peptide
Author(s) -
Nazerian Peiman,
Vanni Simone,
Zanobetti Maurizio,
Polidori Gianluca,
Pepe Giuseppe,
Federico Roberto,
Cangioli Elisabetta,
Grifoni Stefano
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
academic emergency medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.221
H-Index - 124
eISSN - 1553-2712
pISSN - 1069-6563
DOI - 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00630.x
Subject(s) - medicine , ejection fraction , emergency department , heart failure , cardiology , prohormone , brain natriuretic peptide , doppler echocardiography , natriuretic peptide , population , diastole , blood pressure , hormone , environmental health , psychiatry
Objectives: Echocardiography is a fundamental tool in the diagnosis of acute left ventricular heart failure (aLVHF). However, a consultative exam is not routinely available in every emergency department (ED). The authors investigated the diagnostic performance of emergency Doppler echocardiography (EDecho) performed by emergency physicians (EPs) for the diagnosis of aLVHF in patients with acute dyspnea. Methods: A convenience sample of acute dyspneic patients was evaluated. For each patient, the Boston criteria score for heart failure was calculated, and N‐terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) and EDecho were contemporaneously performed. Four investigators, after a limited echocardiography course, performed EDechos and evaluated for a “restrictive” pattern on pulsed Doppler analysis of mitral inflow and reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction. The final diagnosis, established after reviewing all patient clinical data except NT‐proBNP and EDecho results, served as the criterion standard. Results: Among 145 patients, 64 (44%) were diagnosed with aLVHF. The median time needed to perform EDecho was 4 minutes. Pulsed Doppler analysis was feasible in 125 patients (84%). The restrictive pattern was more sensitive (82%) and specific (90%) than reduced LV ejection fraction and more specific than the Boston criteria and NT‐proBNP for the diagnosis of aLVHF. Considering noninterpretable values of the restrictive pattern and uncertain values (“gray areas”) of Boston criteria (4 < Boston criteria score < 7) and of NT‐proBNP (300 < NT‐proBNP < 2,200 pg/mL) as false results, the accuracy of the restrictive pattern in the overall population was 75%, compared with accuracy of 49% for both NT‐proBNP and Boston criteria. Conclusions: EDecho, particularly pulsed Doppler analysis of mitral inflow, is a rapid and accurate diagnostic tool in the evaluation of patients with acute dyspnea. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:18–26 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine