Emergency Physicians’ Risk Attitudes in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Patients

Objectives:  Despite the existence of various clinical prediction rules, no data exist defining what frequency of death or serious nonfatal outcomes comprises a realistic “low‐risk” group for clinicians. This exploratory study sought to identify emergency physicians’ (EPs) definition of low‐risk acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) emergency department (ED) patients. Methods:  Surveys were mailed to full‐time physicians ( n =  88) in a multihospital EP group in southwestern Pennsylvania between December 2004 and February 2005. Participation was voluntary, and each EP was asked to define low risk (low risk of all‐cause 30‐day death and low risk of either hospital death or other serious medical complications) and choose a risk threshold at which they might consider outpatient management for those with ADHF. A range of choices was offered (<0.5, <1, <2, <3, <4, and <5%), and demographic data were collected. Results:  The response rate was 80%. Physicians defined low risk both for all‐cause 30‐day death and for hospital death or other serious complications, at <1% (38.8 and 40.3%, respectively). The decision threshold to consider outpatient therapy was <0.5% risk both for all‐cause 30‐day death (44.6%) and for hospital death or serious medical complications (44.4%). Conclusions:  Emergency physicians in this exploratory study define low‐risk ADHF patients as having less than a 1% risk of 30‐day death or inpatient death or complications. They state a desire to have and use an ADHF clinical prediction rule that can identify low‐risk ADHF patients who have less than a 0.5% risk of 30‐day death or inpatient death or complications. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:108–110 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine