Premium
Clinical Assessment of Ischemia‐modified Albumin and Heart Fatty Acid–binding Protein in the Early Diagnosis of Non‐ST‐elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Emergency Department
Author(s) -
Charpentier Sandrine,
Ducassé Jean Louis,
Cournot Maxime,
MaupasSchwalm Françoise,
Elbaz Meyer,
Baixas Cécile,
Juchet Henri,
Lang Thierry,
Lauque Dominique
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
academic emergency medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.221
H-Index - 124
eISSN - 1553-2712
pISSN - 1069-6563
DOI - 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00614.x
Subject(s) - medicine , acute coronary syndrome , emergency department , chest pain , myocardial infarction , cardiology , prospective cohort study , st segment , heart type fatty acid binding protein , myocardial infarction diagnosis , fatty acid binding protein , psychiatry , gene , biochemistry , chemistry
Objectives: Heart fatty acid–binding protein (h‐FABP) and ischemia‐modified albumin (IMA) have recently been evaluated, but to the best of our knowledge, no study has reported an analysis of these two markers for the detection of early myocardial infarction and myocardial ischemia in a large cohort of consecutive patients presenting to an emergency department (ED). This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy and the clinical utility of h‐FABP and IMA for non‐ST‐segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS) diagnosis in the first hour of management in an ED. Methods: In a prospective 11‐month study, 677 patients admitted to the ED with chest pain and suspected non‐ST‐segment elevation ACS were enrolled. On presentation, blood samples were obtained for the measurement of the biomarkers h‐FABP (immunodetection with CardioDetect) and IMA (albumin cobalt‐binding test). Two physicians, blinded to the results of the markers, independently categorized patients as having or not having non‐ST‐segment elevation ACS. Results: Of the 677 patients who were prospectively recruited, non‐ST‐segment elevation ACS was diagnosed in 185 (27.3%). While IMA was not predictive of the ACS diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.23; 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.81), h‐FABP was predictive of ACS diagnosis (OR = 4.65; 95% CI = 2.39 to 9.04) with specificity at 96.8% (95% CI = 95.4% to 98.1%) and sensitivity at 13.5% (95% CI = 10.9% to 16.1%). However, h‐FABP did not add significant additional information to a predictive model that included the usual diagnostic tools for non‐ST‐elevation ACS management (p = 0.40). Conclusions: In this study on a large cohort of patients admitted to an ED for chest pain, IMA and h‐FABP did not provide valuable information for ACS diagnosis. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:27–35 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine