Premium
Contrast M‐Mode Power Doppler Ultrasound in the Detection of Right‐to‐Left Shunts: Utility of Submandibular Internal Carotid Artery Recording
Author(s) -
Topçuoglu M. A.,
Palacios I. F.,
Buonanno F. S.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of neuroimaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.822
H-Index - 64
eISSN - 1552-6569
pISSN - 1051-2284
DOI - 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2003.tb00198.x
Subject(s) - medicine , transcranial doppler , middle cerebral artery , ultrasound , internal carotid artery , doppler effect , common carotid artery , radiology , nuclear medicine , cerebral arteries , carotid arteries , cardiology , ischemia , physics , astronomy
Cardiac right‐to‐left shunts (RLSs) can be detected by echo‐cardiography and transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD). In patients without adequate transtemporal bone windows, results may be obtained by insonating extracranial arteries; however, the sensitivity and practicality of this approach is unknown. In 34 patients evaluated with echocardiography for RLSs, 73 studies were performed with unilateral, simultaneous contrast TCD (cTCD) of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and submandibular power M‐mode Doppler (PMD)ultrasound of the extracranial internal carotid artery (ecICA). The number of microbubble (MB) signals and their times of first appearance were determined. RLS volume was graded on 6 levels (I = trace, II = small, III = medium, IVa = large, IVb = shower, IVc = curtain) and compared between MCA and ecICA recordings. In 2 of 24 cTCD studies in 15 patients without evidence of RLSs on single‐gated MCA monitoring, low‐volume RLSs (grades I and II) were detected via ecICA insonation; in both, MB signatures were tracked in the ecICA, passing into the ipsilateral ACA. In 40 of 49 studies (26 patients) in which RLSs were demonstrated with single‐gated MCA monitoring, more MBs were detected in the ecICA than the MCA, with either single‐gated or M‐mode images, with increases of 76.9% and 66.1%, respectively ( P = .027). Compared to single‐gated studies, M‐mode technology detected nonsignificant increases in MB number in both the MCA and the ecICA (by 20.2% and 14.0%, respectively). Contrast PMD with cervical ICA recording is at least as sensitive and specific as the traditional MCA method in detecting RLSs; furthermore, this method seems to be more sensitive for low‐volume RLSs (grades I‐III) because of air MB decay (9.2%) and entry into the ipsilateral ACA (34.2%). This is in concordance with the increase of detected RLS grades observed in 32.7% of patients with echocardiography‐documented RLSs. The authors therefore suggest the incorporation of ecICA PMD not only in patients with poor ultrasonic bone windows but also in every patient being evaluated for suspected RLSs.