Premium
Elastic Indentation Response of Float Glass Surfaces
Author(s) -
Muller Andrea M.,
Green David J.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of the american ceramic society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.9
H-Index - 196
eISSN - 1551-2916
pISSN - 0002-7820
DOI - 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03377.x
Subject(s) - float glass , indentation , materials science , composite material , borosilicate glass , cracking , elastic modulus , tin , modulus , soda lime glass , surface finish , surface roughness , contact area , metallurgy
Instrumented Hertzian indentation was used to evaluate the reduced elastic modulus and cone‐crack initiation forces for the as‐received surfaces of commercial float glasses. Custom‐built indentation equipment with the capability of acoustic emission detection was used to monitor continuously the load and depth of penetration at the microscopic scale for forces up to 1 kN. Equipment verification was performed using a reference material, GE 124. The air and tin surfaces of commercial soda–lime–silica and borosilicate float glasses were tested to determine any difference in indentation response for the elastic and fracture behavior of as‐received surfaces. Information obtained from the analysis of the load–displacement curves and from the visual inspection of the indentation sites was used to determine the elastic modulus, and the conditions for the onset of cone cracking as a function of surface roughness. The reduced modulus results were verified using additional equipment that allowed the in situ observation of the contact area during loading and unloading. The results showed that there was no difference in the reduced modulus data for the air and tin surfaces for the range of surface displacements studied. The same conclusions were found for cone‐cracking loads on as‐received surfaces but tests on abraded surfaces showed that the tin surfaces had slightly more resistance to cone cracking than the air surfaces.