z-logo
Premium
Interdiffusion Between Ti 3 SiC 2 –Ti 3 GeC 2 and Ti 2 AlC–Nb 2 AlC Diffusion Couples
Author(s) -
Ganguly Adrish,
Barsoum Michel W.,
Doherty Roger D.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of the american ceramic society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.9
H-Index - 196
eISSN - 1551-2916
pISSN - 0002-7820
DOI - 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01680.x
Subject(s) - materials science , diffusion , analytical chemistry (journal) , thermal diffusivity , atmospheric temperature range , metal , transition metal , diffusion barrier , chemical composition , titanium , crystallography , tantalum , metallurgy , chemistry , thermodynamics , composite material , layer (electronics) , biochemistry , physics , chromatography , catalysis , organic chemistry
In this work, we report on the interdiffusion of Ge and Si in Ti 3 SiC 2 and Ti 3 GeC 2 , as well as that of Nb and Ti in Ti 2 AlC and Nb 2 AlC. The interdiffusion coefficient, D int , measured by analyzing the diffusion profiles of Si and Ge obtained when Ti 3 SiC 2 –Ti 3 GeC 2 diffusion couples are annealed in the 1473–1773 K temperature range at the Matano interface composition (≈Ti 3 Ge 0.5 Si 0.5 C 2 ), was found to be given byDint increased with increasing Ge composition. At the highest temperatures, diffusion was halted after a short time, apparently by the formation of a diffusion barrier of TiC. Similarly, the interdiffusion of Ti and Nb in Ti 2 AlC–Nb 2 AlC couples was measured in the 1723–1873 K temperature range. The D int for the Matano interface composition, viz. ≈(Ti 0.5 ,Nb 0.5 ) 2 AlC, was found to be given byAt 1773 K, the diffusivity of the transition metal atoms was ≈7 times smaller than those of the Si and Ge atoms, suggesting that the former are better bound in the structure than the latter.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here