z-logo
Premium
Deformation and Cracking in Ge–Sb–Se Chalcogenide Glasses During Indentation
Author(s) -
Varshneya Arun K.,
Mauro Daniel J.,
Rangarajan Badri,
Bowden Bradley F.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of the american ceramic society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.9
H-Index - 196
eISSN - 1551-2916
pISSN - 0002-7820
DOI - 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01365.x
Subject(s) - brinell scale , materials science , indentation , composite material , borosilicate glass , cracking , ternary operation , elastic modulus , deformation (meteorology) , brittleness , chalcogenide , nanoindentation , vickers hardness test , mineralogy , metallurgy , geology , microstructure , alloy , computer science , programming language
Deformation and cracking behavior of Ge–Sb–Se binary and ternary chalcogenide glasses of varying average covalent coordination number, 〈 r 〉, was studied by indenting with Vickers and Brinell microindenters using static and recording machines, and subsequent analysis using a non‐contact profilometer. Vickers‐produced cracks were the smallest around the GeSe 4 composition (〈 r 〉=2.4) after unloading, hence the indentation toughness was a maximum and the brittleness a minimum at 〈 r 〉=2.4. Brinell‐created pond (crater) depth, the mound (pile‐up) height, and the radial fractures originating from the mounds displayed minima in the binaries, presumably due to maximized elastic recovery around 〈 r 〉=2.4. Consequently, Brinell hardness computed from the unloaded depth ( H BD ) showed a maximum around GeSe 4 . The maximized elastic recovery around GeSe 4 is consistent with Phillips' optimized connectivity arguments. GeSe 4 resembles the “anomalous” SiO 2 glass for deformation and cracking behavior. Surprisingly, many of the extrema were nearly non‐existent in the ternary glasses. The apparent contrast to the binary glasses is not understood.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here