Premium
Alpha‐Tubulin and Small Subunit rRNA Phylogenies of Peritrichs Are Congruent and Do Not Support the Clustering of Mobilids and Sessilids (Ciliophora, Oligohymenophorea)
Author(s) -
GONG YINGCHUN,
XU KUIDONG,
ZHAN ZIFENG,
YU YUHE,
LI XUEMEI,
VILLALOBO EDUARDO,
FENG WEISONG
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of eukaryotic microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.067
H-Index - 77
eISSN - 1550-7408
pISSN - 1066-5234
DOI - 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2010.00472.x
Subject(s) - biology , ribosomal rna , protein subunit , tubulin , evolutionary biology , cluster analysis , protozoa , zoology , genetics , microtubule , gene , statistics , mathematics
. Peritrich ciliates have been traditionally subdivided into two orders, Sessilida and Mobilida within the subclass Peritrichia. However, all the existing small subunit (SSU) rRNA phylogenetic trees showed that the sessilids and mobilids did not branch together. To shed some light on this disagreement, we tested whether or not the classic Peritrichia is a monophyletic group by assessing the reliability of the SSU rRNA phylogeny in terms of congruency with α‐tubulin phylogeny. For this purpose, we obtained 10 partial α‐tubulin sequences from peritrichs and built phylogenetic trees based on α‐tubulin nucleotide and amino acid data. A phylogenetic tree from the α‐tubulin and SSU rRNA genes in combination was also constructed and compared with that from the SSU rRNA gene using a similar species sampling. Our results show that the mobilids and sessilids are consistently separated in all trees, which reinforces the idea that the peritrichs do not constitute a monophyletic group. However, in all α‐tubulin gene trees, the urceolariids and trichodiniids do not group together, suggested mobilids may not be a monophyletic group.