z-logo
Premium
Small subunit ribosomal RNA sequences of Phaeodarea challenge the monophyly of Haeckel's Radiolaria
Author(s) -
POLET STEPHANE,
BERNEY CÉDRIC,
FAHRNI JOSÉ,
PAWLOWSKI JAN
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of eukaryotic microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.067
H-Index - 77
eISSN - 1550-7408
pISSN - 1066-5234
DOI - 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.05202003_1_66.x
Subject(s) - radiolaria , biology , monophyly , ribosomal rna , protist , 28s ribosomal rna , evolutionary biology , phylogenetic tree , botany , rna , clade , genetics , gene , ribosome
In his grand monography of Radiolaria, Ernst Haeckel originally placed Phaeodarea within the class Radiolaria, together with Acantharea and Polycystinea. Cytological and ultrastructural studies, however, questioned the monophyly of Radiolaria, suggesting the independent evolutionary origin of the three taxa. Some recent molecular analyses based on small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) sequences challenged this classification, supporting the sisterhood of Acantharea and Polycystinea. In order to further test the monophyly of all Haeckel's Radiolaria, and as no data on Phaeodarea were available, we sequenced the complete SSU rRNA gene of three Phaeodarea and three Polycystinea. Our analyses show that the monophyletic Phaeodarea clearly branch among Cercozoa, and confirm that Acantharea and Polycystinea share a common history. This result enhances the morphological variability within Cercozoa, a phylum already containing very heterogeneous groups of protists. Our study suggests that the ability to secrete SrSO 4 and the organization of microtubules inside axopodia are better phylogenetic markers than the simple presence of a central capsule and axopodia.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here