Premium
Morphogenesis in the Hymenostome Ciliate Pseudocohnilembus persalinus and its Taxonomic and Phylogenetic Implications *
Author(s) -
EVANS FREDERICK R.,
CORLISS JOHN O.
Publication year - 1964
Publication title -
the journal of protozoology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.067
H-Index - 77
eISSN - 1550-7408
pISSN - 0022-3921
DOI - 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1964.tb01764.x
Subject(s) - ciliate , biology , ciliata , morphogenesis , taxonomy (biology) , systematics , evolutionary biology , zoology , ecology , protozoa , botany , genetics , gene
SYNOPSIS. Morphogenesis in the small holotrich ciliate Pseudocohnilembus persalinus has been found to be more complex than that reported to date for any other hymenostome species, at least with respect to the major phenomenon of stomatogenesis. Formation of two anlagen or fields of proliferating kinetosomes in the vicinity of the old oral area initiates the highly autonomous process. Subsequently a number of separate but coordinated morphogenetic movements occur which involve not only the new anlagen and their extraordinary growth and fragmentation but also the bases of the “old” ciliary buccal organelles. Particularly indispensable in our investigation was the Bodian protargol technique which reveals the external ciliature of a properly fixed organism as well as components of its infraciliature. The Chatton‐Lwoff silver impregnation method, however, was also very useful in the overall comparative study of the present and related species of ciliates. At one stage in stomatogenesis of Pseudocohnilembus persalinus there is clear evidence of a basic tetrahymenal plan of organization of the buccal ciliature, even though this is not at all apparent in the mature, non‐dividing ciliate. Such a revelation underlines the significant value of morphogenetic studies in comparative ciliate systematics, for our findings permit retention of the genus Pseudocohnilembus in the suborder Tetrahymenina of the holotrich order Hymenostomatida. At the same time, however, they necessitate revision of some currently held concepts in the fields of ciliate morphology, taxonomy, and phylogeny.