Microvascular Repair: Post‐Angiogenesis Vascular Dynamics

Please cite this paper as: LeBlanc AJ, Krishnan L, Sullivan CJ, Williams SK, Hoying JB. Microvascular repair: post‐angiogenesis vascular dynamics. Microcirculation 19 : 676–695, 2012. Abstract Vascular compromise and the accompanying perfusion deficits cause or complicate a large array of disease conditions and treatment failures. This has prompted the exploration of therapeutic strategies to repair or regenerate vasculatures, thereby establishing more competent microcirculatory beds. Growing evidence indicates that an increase in vessel numbers within a tissue does not necessarily promote an increase in tissue perfusion. Effective regeneration of a microcirculation entails the integration of new stable microvessel segments into the network via neovascularization. Beginning with angiogenesis, neovascularization entails an integrated series of vascular activities leading to the formation of a new mature microcirculation, and includes vascular guidance and inosculation, vessel maturation, pruning, AV specification, network patterning, structural adaptation, intussusception, and microvascular stabilization. While the generation of new vessel segments is necessary to expand a network, without the concomitant neovessel remodeling and adaptation processes intrinsic to microvascular network formation, these additional vessel segments give rise to a dysfunctional microcirculation. While many of the mechanisms regulating angiogenesis have been detailed, a thorough understanding of the mechanisms driving post‐angiogenesis activities specific to neovascularization has yet to be fully realized, but is necessary to develop effective therapeutic strategies for repairing compromised microcirculations as a means to treat disease.