Premium
Environmental Inequity: An Analysis of Large‐Scale Hog Operations in 17 States, 1982–1997 *
Author(s) -
Stretesky Paul B.,
Johnston Janis E.,
Arney Jeremy
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
rural sociology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.083
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1549-0831
pISSN - 0036-0112
DOI - 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00136.x
Subject(s) - census , disadvantaged , ethnic group , equity (law) , scale (ratio) , american community survey , geography , agriculture , white (mutation) , inequality , demographic economics , economic growth , socioeconomics , political science , demography , sociology , economics , cartography , population , archaeology , mathematical analysis , biochemistry , chemistry , mathematics , law , gene
This study extends ideas of environmental equity to large‐scale hog operations. We investigate counties in 17 hog producing states to determine whether large‐scale hog operations are more likely to be sited and expanded in areas that have a disproportionate number of Black, Hispanic, and/or economically disadvantaged residents. The data for this work come from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the U.S. Bureau of Census. We discover evidence of racial inequity, but only in those states where large‐scale operations are being rapidly sited and expanded (i.e., Iowa, North Carolina, and Minnesota). There is no evidence of ethnic or economic inequality. We conclude that reductions in community quality of life attributable to large‐scale hog operations are more likely to be found in counties that are disproportionately Black than White if located in states that are expanding the number of large‐scale hog operations.