Premium
A Model for Change to Evidence‐Based Practice
Author(s) -
Rosswurm Mary Ann,
Larrabee June H.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
image: the journal of nursing scholarship
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.009
H-Index - 80
eISSN - 1547-5069
pISSN - 0743-5150
DOI - 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1999.tb00510.x
Subject(s) - cinahl , evidence based practice , systematic review , empirical evidence , medline , evidence based medicine , process (computing) , best practice , nursing research , psychology , knowledge management , medical education , medicine , nursing , computer science , alternative medicine , psychological intervention , political science , philosophy , epistemology , pathology , law , operating system
Purpose: To describe a model that guides nurses and other healthcare professionals through a systematic process for the change to evidence‐based practice. The tremendous increases in clinical research and accessibility to research findings have prepared the way for the paradigm shift from traditional and intuition‐driven practice to evidence‐based practice. Although several models have emerged to guide practitioners in research utilization, practitioners continue to have difficulty synthesizing empirical and contextual evidence and integrating evidence‐based changes into practice. Organizing Framework: The model is based on theoretical and research literature related to evidence‐based practice, research utilization, standardized language, and change theory. In this model, practitioners are guided through the entire process of developing and integrating an evidence‐based practice change. The model supports evidence‐based practice changes derived from a combination of quantitative and qualitative data, clinical expertise, and contextual evidence. Methods: The model was developed using sources identified on searches of Medline, CINAHL, and systematic reviews available on the Internet. Review topics were focused on evidence‐based medicine and nursing, research utilization, and change process. Other sources included clinical expertise and quality‐improvement information. Conclusions: Practitioners need skills and resources to appraise, synthesize, and diffuse the best evidence into practice. Patient outcomes must reflect discipline‐specific and interdisciplinary accountabilities. Collaboration between researchers and practitioners within and among disciplines will enhance the diffusion of evidence‐based practice innovations.