Premium
Coalitions and Family Problem Solving with Preadolescents in Referred, At‐Risk, and Comparison Families
Author(s) -
Vuchinich Samuel,
Wood Barbara,
Vuchinich Regina
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
family process
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.011
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1545-5300
pISSN - 0014-7370
DOI - 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1994.00409.x
Subject(s) - psychology , scapegoat , developmental psychology , marital status , stepfamily , family income , demography , population , political science , law , economics , economic growth , sociology
This study tested the hypothesis that the mother‐father coalition, parent‐child coalitions, and parental warmth expressed toward the child are associated with family problem solving in families with a preadolescent child referred for treatment of behavior problems ( n = 30 ), families with a child at‐risk for conduct disorder ( n = 68 ), and a sample of comparison families ( n = 90 ). Referred and at‐risk families displayed less effective problem solving. A regression analysis, which controlled for gender of the child, family structure, family income, marital satisfaction, and severity of child problems, showed that strong parental coalitions were linked to low levels of family problem solving in at‐risk and referred families. Parent‐child coalitions had little apparent impact while parental warmth was highly correlated with better family problem solving. The results may be interpreted as evidence for a tendency for parents in at‐risk and referred families to “scapegoat” a preadolescent during family problem‐solving sessions. This may undermine progress on family problem solutions and may complicate family‐based prevention and treatment programs that use family problem‐solving sessions.