z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Effects of Glucose‐Insulin‐Potassium Infusion on QT Dispersion in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
Author(s) -
Wolk Robert,
Lusawa Tomasz,
Ceremuzynski Leszek
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
annals of noninvasive electrocardiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.494
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1542-474X
pISSN - 1082-720X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1542-474x.2001.tb00086.x
Subject(s) - medicine , qt interval , myocardial infarction , placebo , insulin , anesthesia , cardiology , potassium , electrocardiography , chemistry , alternative medicine , organic chemistry , pathology
Background: Increased QT dispersion during acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been associated with the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias. Also, serum potassium levels have been shown to be relevant to the arrhythmic risk in this group of patients. The aim of the present study was to assess changes in QT dispersion during infusion of glucose‐insulin‐potassium (GIK) during AMI. Methods: Patients from the Pol‐GIK study were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were selected from the placebo (1000 ml of 0.89% NaCI) and the GIK (1000 ml of 10% dextrose, 20–32 units of insulin, 80 mEq K+) groups (18 and 24 patients, respectively). QT interval duration and dispersion the difference between the longest and shortest QT intervals) were measured at baseline, 18–24 hours into placebo/GIK infusion and 24 hours after the end of infusion. Results: In the placebo group, plasma potassium levels changed from 4.1 ± 0.5 mmol/L at baseline to 4.6 ± 0.8 mmol/L during infusion (P < 0.05) and 4.6 ± 0.4 mmol/L after infusion, whereas in the GIK group the respective values were 4.0 ± 0.4, 4.6 ± 0.3 (P < 0.0001), and 4.5 ± 0.5 mmol/L. QT interval duration was stable throughout the study and there was no difference between the groups. The two groups did not differ in respect to QT dispersion at any time point, the respective values were 79 ± 28, 65 ± 25, and 77 ± 27 ms in the placebo group, and 61 ± 35, 60 ± 26, and 76 ± 43 ms in the GIK group. The incidence of arrhythmias was also similar in both groups. Conclusions: GIK, at the dose used, is unlikely to affect heterogeneity of ventricular repolarization during AMI. A.N.E. 2001;6(1)50–54

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here