Open AccessPredictive Value of QT Dispersion for Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
Author(s) -
Grimm Wolfram,
Steder Ulrike,
Menz Volker,
Maisch Bernhard
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
annals of noninvasive electrocardiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.494
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1542-474X
pISSN - 1082-720X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1542-474x.1996.tb00299.x
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiology , implantable cardioverter defibrillator , qt interval , repolarization , sudden cardiac death , electrocardiography , ventricular tachycardia , dispersion (optics) , electrophysiology , physics , optics
Background: QT dispersion, measured as interlead variability of QT intervals in the surface electrocardiogram, has been demonstrated to provide an indirect measurement of the inhomogeneity of myocardial repolarization as a potential substrate for ventricular arrhythmias. Methods: QT dispersion was measured in the standard 12‐lead ECG in 51 patients at the time of implantation of a third generation implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) with automatic electrogram storage capability for electrical events triggering device therapy. In addition, QT dispersion was measured in 100 age‐ and sex‐matched healthy controls. All 5 1 study patients with ICD were prospectively followed to determine possible associations between QT dispersion at implant and subsequent spontaneous ICD shocks for ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT). Results: Rate‐corrected QT dispersion and adjusted QTc dispersion, which takes account of the number of leads measured, were significantly greater in ICD patients compared to controls (76 ± 25 ms vs 46 ± 11 ms, and 24 ± 7 ms vs 14 ± 3 ms respectively, P < 0.0 1). During 15 ± 8 months follow‐up, ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurred in 23 (45%) of 51 ICD patients. QTc dispersion and adjusted QTc dispersion were not significantly different between ICD patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias and ICD patients without ventricular tachyarrhythmias during follow‐up (74 ± 19 ms versus 77 ± 29 ms, and 23 ± 6 ms vs 25 ± 8 ms respectively). Conclusion: Increased QT dispersion measured in the 12‐lead standard ECG does not appear to be a useful marker for future arrhythmic events in a mixed patient population with ICD.