Premium
Risking Regulation, Regulating Risk: Lessons from the Transatlantic Biotech Dispute
Author(s) -
Zerbe Noah
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
review of policy research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.832
H-Index - 45
eISSN - 1541-1338
pISSN - 1541-132X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2007.00292.x
Subject(s) - agricultural biotechnology , context (archaeology) , promotion (chess) , european union , agriculture , political science , emerging technologies , international trade , law and economics , political economy , microbiology and biotechnology , economics , law , politics , biology , ecology , paleontology , materials science , nanotechnology
Debates over the future of new technologies frequently implicate governmental policies and regulation, the purpose of which has traditionally been to mitigate the dangers of new technologies through promotion of conditions of safe use. It is increasingly recognized, however, that regulation is predicated on a particular conception of the nature of risk which may or may not correspond to the views and beliefs held by society. Here I explore three broadly related questions in the context of the debates around agricultural biotechnology. First, what are the implications of varying conceptions of risk for regulatory policy in the United States and in the European Union? Second, what are the implications of differing conceptions of risk and resulting regulatory policy for agricultural trade relations between the two giants of international trade? And finally, what lessons might we draw from contemporary disputes over agricultural biotechnology?