Premium
Time‐Dependent Predictive Accuracy in the Presence of Competing Risks
Author(s) -
Saha P.,
Heagerty P. J.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
biometrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.298
H-Index - 130
eISSN - 1541-0420
pISSN - 0006-341X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01375.x
Subject(s) - bivariate analysis , event (particle physics) , statistics , computer science , proportional hazards model , econometrics , biometrics , accelerated failure time model , estimation , data mining , mathematics , artificial intelligence , economics , management , physics , quantum mechanics
Summary Competing risks arise naturally in time‐to‐event studies. In this article, we propose time‐dependent accuracy measures for a marker when we have censored survival times and competing risks. Time‐dependent versions of sensitivity or true positive (TP) fraction naturally correspond to consideration of either cumulative (or prevalent) cases that accrue over a fixed time period, or alternatively to incident cases that are observed among event‐free subjects at any select time. Time‐dependent ( dynamic ) specificity (1–false positive (FP)) can be based on the marker distribution among event‐free subjects. We extend these definitions to incorporate cause of failure for competing risks outcomes. The proposed estimation for cause‐specific cumulative TP/dynamic FP is based on the nearest neighbor estimation of bivariate distribution function of the marker and the event time. On the other hand, incident TP/dynamic FP can be estimated using a possibly nonproportional hazards Cox model for the cause‐specific hazards and riskset reweighting of the marker distribution. The proposed methods extend the time‐dependent predictive accuracy measures of Heagerty, Lumley, and Pepe (2000, Biometrics 56, 337–344) and Heagerty and Zheng (2005, Biometrics 61, 92–105).