Premium
Governmental Suasion: Refocusing the Lowi Policy Typology
Author(s) -
Anderson John L.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
policy studies journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 69
eISSN - 1541-0072
pISSN - 0190-292X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1997.tb00020.x
Subject(s) - coercion (linguistics) , typology , politics , legalization , power (physics) , work (physics) , affect (linguistics) , public policy , political science , public administration , sociology , law , engineering , communication , anthropology , mechanical engineering , philosophy , linguistics , physics , quantum mechanics
This paper argues that suasion should receive direct attention from political scientists who study public policy. Building on the work of Theodore Lowi and others, it is suggested that understanding politics as the result of the applicability of coercion misses important aspects of governmental activities. Suasion, unlike coercion, brings about certain forms of politics that are unique, quite unlike coercively based policies. Specifically, the author explores the advent of public health to discover how suasive policies affect politics. Above this race of men stands an immense and tutelary power, which takes upon itself alone to secure their gratifications, and to watch over their fate. That power is absolute, minute, regular, provident and mild.