Premium
Expert Policy in Juvenile Justice
Author(s) -
Petersen Rebecca D.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
policy studies journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 69
eISSN - 1541-0072
pISSN - 0190-292X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1995.tb00539.x
Subject(s) - economic justice , juvenile , selection (genetic algorithm) , democracy , citizenship , political science , order (exchange) , power (physics) , public relations , public administration , law , business , politics , computer science , genetics , physics , finance , quantum mechanics , artificial intelligence , biology
Policy design and analysis is conducted primarily by professional experts who often use objectively‐defined criteria in the selection of those eligible for a policy and objective measurements to evaluate the effectiveness of a program. Juvenile justice policies, such as Juvenile Intensive Probation Supervision (JIPS), often are developed by experts who aim at correcting individual problems of youths rather than identifying problems with the structures of our society. Policies such as JIPS do not encourage participation of the recipients or of the wider community. In essence, the experts are removing power from already powerless youths and citizens, and thus are placing it in the hands of a few who are viewed as knowing what is best for everyone. As such, policies developed by experts often do not encourage democracy and citizenship. This articles suggests how youths, their families, parents, and communities can and need to become empowered in order for justice and democracy to prevail.