z-logo
Premium
Codification, patents and the geography of knowledge transfer in the electronic musical instrument industry
Author(s) -
REIFFENSTEIN TIM
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
the canadian geographer / le géographe canadien
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.35
H-Index - 46
eISSN - 1541-0064
pISSN - 0008-3658
DOI - 10.1111/j.1541-0064.2006.00143.x
Subject(s) - tacit knowledge , context (archaeology) , variety (cybernetics) , novelty , space (punctuation) , knowledge transfer , musical , knowledge management , sociology , perspective (graphical) , psychology , geography , computer science , visual arts , social psychology , art , archaeology , artificial intelligence , operating system
Recent research in economic geography has emphasized tacit knowledge as the basis of industrial learning. In contrast, codification and the practices of industrial writing have received little attention for the roles they play in mobilizing knowledge across space. This paper offers insight into the geographies of codification through an examination of technology transfer in the electronic musical instrument industry between 1965 and 1995. The research draws on a variety of primary and secondary data that include interviews with inventors, biographical accounts and patent analysis. These sources offer perspective on the career trajectories of three U.S. inventors who transferred knowledge from various contexts in California's high‐tech industry to the Japanese firm, Yamaha. Conceptually, the paper draws on the actor–network theory and Latour's idea of translation to highlight the detours inventors must take to register novelty. The analysis reveals the problematic nature of codified knowledge and its transfer; in this case codified knowledge was mobile internationally but not locally, at least until it reached Japan. The paper argues for the need to understand how texts such as patents are produced—the context of their authorship, the geographies of their circulation and their efficacy for shaping further innovative practice.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here