Premium
Comparison of Risk Profile and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgical and Catheter‐based Revascularization
Author(s) -
Aldea Gabriel S.,
Gaudiani Jennifer A.,
Shapira Oz M.,
O'Gara Paul,
Bao Yusheng,
Lazar Harold L.,
Shemin Richard J.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of cardiac surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.428
H-Index - 58
eISSN - 1540-8191
pISSN - 0886-0440
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8191.1998.tb01238.x
Subject(s) - medicine , revascularization , catheter , myocardial revascularization , surgery , myocardial infarction , artery
A bstract Background : The effects of the randomized revascularization trials and improved strategies and techniques for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous transluminal catheter‐based revascularization (PTCR) on current patient selection and clinical outcomes are unknown. Methods : We evaluated a concurrent, contemporary (1995 to 1997), and consecutive group of patients undergoing CABG (n = 982) or PTCR (n = 939) in a single institution that participated in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) trial. Results are presented as percent or mean ± SD. Compared to PTCR, patients undergoing CABG were older (66.2 ± 10.7 vs 62.0 ± 11.8 years, p < 0.05) with a higher incidence of hypertension (73.3% vs 52.4%, p < 0.05), diabetes (32.5% vs 23.1%, p < 0.05), active smoking (67.8% vs 27.2%, p < 0.05), prior myocardial infarction (MI) (66.8% vs 28.5%, p < 0.05), peripheral vascular disease (19.8% vs 7.7%, p < 0.05), prior cerebrovascular accident (CVA)/transient ischemic attack (TIA) (6.4% vs. 2.8%, p < 0.05), and a lower ejection fraction (48.7% ± 14.5% vs 55.3% ± 11.7%, p < 0.05). The presenting functional class and incidence of female gender were similar for both revascularization strategies. Results : Compared to patients undergoing CABG, those undergoing PTCR were more likely to have single or two vessel coronary artery disease (88.6% vs 23.1%, p < 0.001) and had fewer vessels revascularized per patient (1.08 ± 0.30 vs 3.5 ± 0.98, p < 0.001). Outcomes were comparable for CABG and PTCR with a similar incidence of death (1.0% vs 0.9%, NS), renal insufficiency (0.7% vs 0.6%, IMS), and CVA/TIA (0.9% vs 0.3%, NS). Patients undergoing CABG had a higher incidence of pulmonary complications (5.2% vs 1.0%, p < 0.05), a lower incidence of periprocedural MI (1.1% vs 4.1%, p < 0.05) and major complication (5.9% vs 9.4%, p < 0.05), but longer hospital stays (6.5 ± 5.1 vs 3.1 ± 2.6 days, p < 0.05). Conclusions : Despite higher clinical and angiographic risk profiles in patients undergoing CABG, clinical results, morbidity, and mortality were comparable to those of PTCR. With evolving techniques, continued reevaluation of indications and outcomes are necessary.