Premium
Enhanced Blood Conservation in Primary Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Using Heparin‐Bonded Circuits with Lower Anticoagulation
Author(s) -
Aldea Gabriel S.,
Zhang Xi,
Memmolo Ciriaco A.,
Shapira Oz M.,
Treanor Patrick R.,
Kupferschmid John P.,
Lazar Harold L.,
Shemin Richard J.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
journal of cardiac surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.428
H-Index - 58
eISSN - 1540-8191
pISSN - 0886-0440
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8191.1996.tb00018.x
Subject(s) - medicine , perioperative , activated clotting time , blood conservation , artery , surgery , heparin , revascularization , bypass grafting , anesthesia , cardiology , myocardial infarction
A bstractBackground : Despite many advances in blood conservation techniques, a significant proportion of patients undergoing primary coronary revascularization still require homologous transfusions. A comprehensive strategy to diminish perioperative blood loss was developed by integrating many individual components to create an improved blood conservation environment and was prospectively applied to 557 patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures performed in our medical center over a 14‐month period. Methods : The first 455 patients were treated with conventional, nonheparinbonded circuits (NHBCs) and full anticoagulation (activated clotting time [ACT] > 480 sec). We wanted to test the hypothesis of whether “tip‐to‐tip” heparin‐bonded circuits (HBCs) used in conjunction with lower anticoagulation (ACT > 280 sec) when added to our current blood conservation environment can further enhance clinical outcomes. We prospectively applied this technique to a consecutive group of patients (n = 102). Results : Compared to patients treated with NHBCs, patients treated with HBCs had a significantly lower mediastinal and pleural chest tube output in the first 24 hours (683 ± 561 mL vs 984 ± 616 mL, p < 0.00001) were less likely to be transfused (52% vs 68.1%, p < 0.01) and had a lower exposure to different blood donor units (4.1 ± 8.4 vs 9.3, ± 10.3, p < 0.3). There were no complications directly related to HBCs used in conjunction with lower anticoagulation. Morbidity and mortality rates were similar in both treatment groups. Conclusion : In summary, HBCs in conjunction with lower anticoagulation were safely applied in patients undergoing primary CABG with marked improvement in blood conservation, and should be considered for broader clinical use.