Premium
Single‐Beat Determination of Right Ventricular Function in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
Author(s) -
Chou ShingHsien,
Kuo ChiTai,
Hsu LungAn,
Ho WanJing,
Wang ChunLi
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
echocardiography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.404
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1540-8175
pISSN - 0742-2822
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2010.01236.x
Subject(s) - beat (acoustics) , cardiology , medicine , atrial fibrillation , mathematics , ventricular function , physics , quantum mechanics
Background: In atrial fibrillation (AF), left ventricular (LV) systolic function positively correlates with the ratio of the preceding to prepreceding RR intervals (RRp/RRpp) and single‐beat determination of LV function at a beat with equal RRp and RRpp closely estimates the average value over all cardiac cycles. The study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of single‐beat determination that was based on the ratio of RRp/RRpp to accurately assess RV function in AF. Methods: In 60 patients with AF, RV fractional area change (RVFAC), RRp and RRpp were measured during 20 beats for each patient. The relationship between RVFAC and RRp/RRpp was evaluated by linear regression analysis. The measured values of RVFAC at the beats with equal RRp and RRpp were compared with the average values over 20 beats. The influence of RRp cycle lengths on the values of RVFAC at the beats with equal RRp and RRpp was examined from the plot of normalized value against RR intervals. Results: There were a positive linear relationship between RVFAC and RRp/RRpp in all patients (P < 0.001 in all). The RVFAC measured by single‐beat method and cycle lengths <500 ms were usually far below the average values. After excluding beats with cycle lengths <500 ms, RVFAC determined by single‐beat method was very close to the average values (y = 0.96x + 1.91%, r = 0.961; P < 0.001; bias 0.26%). Conclusions: RV FAC correlates positively with RRp/RRpp and single‐beat determination of RV function is feasible and accurate in patients with chronic AF. (Echocardiography 2010;27:1188‐1193)