Premium
Fast Data Acquisition and Analysis with Real Time Triplane Echocardiography for the Assessment of Left Ventricular Size and Function: A Validation Study
Author(s) -
Nucifora Gaetano,
Badano Luigi P.,
Dall'Armellina Erica,
Gianfagna Pasquale,
Allocca Giuseppe,
Fioretti Paolo M.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
echocardiography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.404
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1540-8175
pISSN - 0742-2822
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2008.00762.x
Subject(s) - reproducibility , medicine , sinus rhythm , cardiology , ejection fraction , cardiac magnetic resonance , ventricular volume , limits of agreement , ventricular function , nuclear medicine , magnetic resonance imaging , cardiac magnetic resonance imaging , radiology , atrial fibrillation , mathematics , heart failure , statistics
Aims: To assess accuracy and reproducibility of real time simultaneous triplane echocardiography (RT3PE) for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as a reference method. Methods and Results: A total of 24 patients with various degrees of LV dysfunction (EF from 36 to 57%) in sinus rhythm with good image quality were enrolled in the study. Digital loops of apical views were recorded with standard two‐dimensional imaging and with RT3PE. Echocardiography and CMR were performed within 1 hour. RT3PE measurements of LV end‐diastolic volume, end‐systolic volume, and EF resulted closely correlated to CMR (r = 0.95, 0.97, and 0.95, respectively) with small biases (−4 ml, −6 ml, and 1%, respectively) and narrow limits of agreement (SD = 15 ml, 12 ml, and 6%, respectively). Two‐dimensional echocardiography ( 2DE) showed a weaker correlation with CMR (r = 0.85, 0.91, and 0.83, respectively; P < 0.06) with similar biases (−4 ml, −10 ml, 5%, respectively), but wider limits of agreement (SD = 28 ml, 21 ml, 10%, respectively, P < 0.007). RT3PE showed lower interobserver variability for the assessment of EF (SD = 2% vs. 5%, P = 0.03) and lower measurement time of LV EF (175 ± 54 sec vs. 241 ± 49 sec, respectively; P < 0.0001), as compared to 2DE. Conclusion: RT3PE allows simple and fast image acquisition and volume calculation. In addition, it allows more accurate and reproducible EF measurements than conventional 2DE.