Premium
Restoring Sinus Rhythm Results in Blood Pressure Reduction in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation and a History of Hypertension
Author(s) -
SANDERS NATALIE A.,
BERTOLONE CRISTINA,
JETTER TAWNI L.,
WASMUND STEPHEN L.,
CROCI FRANCESCO,
SOLANO ALBERTO,
BRIGNOLE MICHELE,
HAMDAN MOHAMED H.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.193
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1540-8167
pISSN - 1045-3873
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02280.x
Subject(s) - medicine , cardioversion , sinus rhythm , atrial fibrillation , blood pressure , cardiology , anesthesia , diastole , heart rate
Effects of Rhythm Control on Blood Pressure . Introduction: The long‐term effects of atrial fibrillation (AF) on blood pressure (BP) in patients with hypertension (HTN) remain unclear. We hypothesized that restoration of normal sinus rhythm (NSR) results in a decrease in BP despite the expected increase in cardiac output. Methods and Results: Twenty‐four‐hour BP measurements were obtained during AF, and on Day 1 and Day 30 post‐successful cardioversion in 18 patients with AF and HTN (cardioversion group), and another 22 patients with AF and HTN with no immediate plans for cardioversion (control group). Except for the duration of AF, the clinical characteristics and use of medications were similar between the groups. In the cardioversion group, a significant decrease in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean blood pressure (MBP) were noted on Day 1 post‐cardioversion with no significant change in systolic blood pressure (SBP): 117/74/88 ± 13/9/9 mmHg during AF and 116/70/85 ± 13/9/10 mmHg during Day 1 post‐cardioversion (P = 0.68; <0.01 and 0.04 for SBP, DBP, and MBP, respectively). In the 13 subjects who remained in NSR at Day 30, DBP and MBP decreased further on Day 30 when compared to Day 1 with no significant change in SBP: 118/76/90 ± 13/7/8 mmHg during AF; 119/72/88 ± 12/8/9 mmHg during Day 1; and 118/69/86 ± 10/8/7 mmHg during Day 30 post‐cardioversion (P = 0.97; <0.001 and 0.03 for SBP, DBP, and MBP, respectively). In the control group, no significant changes in BP were noted. Conclusion: Restoring NSR in patients with AF and HTN resulted in a sustained decrease in DBP and MBP. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that maintenance of NSR improves BP control in patients with AF and HTN. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 722‐726, July 2012)