Premium
Interatrial Mechanical Dyssynchrony Worsened Atrial Mechanical Function in Sinus Node Disease With or Without Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Author(s) -
WANG MEI,
LAU CHU PAK,
ZHANG XUE HUA,
SIU CHUNGWAH,
LEE KATHY L. F.,
YAN GUO HUI,
YUE WEN SHENG,
TSE HUNG FAT
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.193
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1540-8167
pISSN - 1045-3873
DOI - 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01547.x
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiology , atrial fibrillation , ejection fraction , doppler imaging , sinus rhythm , heart failure , diastole , blood pressure
Atrial electromechanical dysfunction might contribute to the development of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with sinus node disease (SND). The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and impact of atrial mechanical dyssynchrony on atrial function in SND patients with or without paroxysmal AF. Methods: We performed echocardiographic examination with tissue Doppler imaging in 30 SND patients with (n = 11) or without (n = 19) paroxysmal AF who received dual‐chamber pacemakers. Tissue Doppler indexes included atrial contraction velocities (Va) and timing events (Ta) were measured at midleft atrial (LA) and right atrial (RA) wall. Intraatrial synchronicity was defined by the standard deviation and maximum time delay of Ta among 6 segments of LA (septal/lateral/inferior/anterior/posterior/anterospetal). Interatrial synchronicity was defined by time delay between Ta from RA and LA free wall. Results: There were no differences in age, P‐wave duration, left ventricular ejection fraction, LA volume, and ejection fraction between with or without AF. Patients with paroxysmal AF had lower mitral inflow A velocity (70 ± 19 vs 91 ± 17 cm/s, P = 0.005), LA active empting fraction (24 ± 14 vs 36 ± 13%, P = 0.027), mean Va of LA (2.6 ± 0.9 vs 3.4 ± 0.9 cm/s, P = 0.028), and greater interatrial synchronicity (33 ± 25 vs 12 ± 19 ms, P = 0.022) than those without AF. Furthermore, a lower mitral inflow A velocity (Odd ratio [OR]= 1.12, 95% Confidence interval [CI] 1.01–1.24, P = 0.025) and prolonged interatrial dyssynchrony (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01–1.16, P = 0.020 ) were independent predictors for the presence of AF in SND patients. Conclusion: SND patients with paroxysmal AF had reduced regional and global active LA mechanical contraction and increased interatrial dyssychrony as compared with those without AF. These findings suggest that abnormal atrial electromechanical properties are associated with AF in SND patients.